The poison/venom thing is the easy “we got this wrong” meme.
The one-every-five-minutes meme is one we take for granted as correct because we see a credible resource PBS cited. It almost sounds plausible… Of course PBS is a secondary source, but we know they do their research, right? Right? This is the hard “we got this wrong” meme.
Because now, everyone who has seen this meme is going to know the “poison/venom” thing*, but they’re going to assume the other factoids are true or credible because this ostensibly came off a PBS feed. But today, anyone can cut and paste imagery together, regardless of facts or credibility.
None. Of. These. “Facts.” Are. Correct.
This is like people who historicize less-than-credible local lore during a local history tour. It’s fun, but it’s purely for entertainment. (Historicization is when facts are embellished with non-fact-checked lore.)
Because you know there is going to be that o-n-e volunteer docent at the natural history center or zoo who is going to see this poison/venom ditty and only spread that “one-every-five” factoid that is totally and completely bullshit.
This reminds me of the photo meme of Pope Francis juxtaposed with obviously athiest belief structure. (See image of Pope Francis above.) The pope would never say these general atheist considerations because they’re not remotely part of Catholicism. I watched many of my Catholic friends pass this around saying, “hey, you know that new pope is a great guy!” In so doing they unfortunately questioned their own understanding of their own faith. I’m not judging whether atheism or Catholicism are good or bad. I’m just showing this as a reminder that what we believe is easily swayed by what we see. Juxtaposing a credible external authority with a sketchy but plausible quote is easy to do.
Bottom line?
It’s pure entertainment. But if it’s partly sketchy, it’s probably all sketchy.
Are you sure of your beliefs? Are you certain of your facts? How much of what you think you know is based on the credibility of your friends trust in those facts rather than in the researched facts themselves?
Think about that, next time you share a fun “science” meme.
* For those not in the know: Venomous refers to something that bites or stings you. Snakes and wasps are “venemous”, for example. Poisonous refers to something you bite/inhale/ingest. This meme’s main delivery requires the person viewing the meme to be familiar with the difference in order for it to be funny. Zoo and wildlife professionals often bring up the difference in their public presentations as a teaching opportunity when they’re on a stage with a venomous animal. However, apparently a number of other languages don’t make the distinction, and clearly in our language, that distinction may be less and less important.
One of my favorite plant groups on facebook has been flooded with BLM posts. The group’s rules are that nothing but plants questions should be posted. It’s a public open group, so anyone can post anything, even though the honor system suggests we should only post about plants. What’s happening here?
Each of us gets a vote. Sounds fair right? Well, I’m here to tell you, it’s not. Hi, this is Chris, the Amateur Ethicist, and on this channel we discuss the crossroads between convenience and technology. If you’re into that kind of thing, why not subscribe, like and share. But I just said our voting…
The Real Economic Villains: What Bill Burr and Kyle Kulinski Got Right I was scrolling through YouTube last night when I stumbled across an episode of Secular Talk where Kyle Kulinski breaks down a recent Bill Burr podcast rant. What struck me wasn’t just how funny Burr’s take was, but how clearly he cut through…
If you could make it so your party would win every election, would you do it? Would you take the steps necessary to fix the vote so that even if your party became a minority, it would still take a majority of legislative seats?
This is a response to Fox New’s and News Nation’s video about Green Berets training Mexican military. In this case, “Ignorant Peasants” are American consumers. (We can hardly call ourselves citizens, since we’re not doing the work of learning about civics. So… we’re consumers, not really citizens.)